It is a good point. One of the problems with stakeholder categories is the way they overlap and can be gamed to over-represent some interests at the expense of others. 

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> just for clarification, I'm not interested in the "person", just the
> "office" being represented by the person.
> 
> Just trying to understand and learn what interests lay in ICANN's
> governance behind the intellectual property administration of the AAMC
> and how that particular constituency is or not being represented
> within the current ICANN sctructure.
>