Hehehe


Please excuse my mobile brevity


-------- Message d'origine --------
De : Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> 
Date : 2015/03/18  4:59 PM  (GMT-05:00) 
À : Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]> 
Cc : [log in to unmask] 
Objet : Re: [NCSG-Discuss] "Doctor, doctor give me the news" 

Yeah. I see sales potential too. As a medical doctor, I could always offer my services as a proxy registrant to anyone who wants to use a domain name under .doctor. :)

Thanks.

Amr

On Mar 18, 2015, at 9:51 PM, Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

It seems to me that the sales potential under .doctor would perhaps be *increased* by the move. 

It would add legitimacy which could help sell the idea to MDs and would presumably help migrate what sites exists under other gTLD such as .com. It would also justify a price premium. 

I'm not sure I would be opposed to it, if i were the applicant ... well ... except to negotiate some other things on the side, of course. It might be counter-intuitive at first, but i think that moves to restrain and differentiate will succeed in extracting more value in the end. Much of the commercial success of a new TLD would, I would think, come from its ability to cater to certain people and so, that should have been the applicants plan for the get go, methinks. 

(I *am* opposed to move, don't get me wrong). 

Nicolas

On 18/03/2015 3:47 PM, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
All,

Here is the “trail” on the reference to the following statement...which leads back to ICANN.

 “Domain-name overseer ICANN has decided that only one kind of doctor may be allowed online – and that is a medical doctor”. 

It is in the article by Kieren McCarthy at http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/03/15/icann_doctors/ 
Kieren cites a blog by Jon Nevett “The .DOCTOR Quarantine” in http://www.circleid.com/posts/20150312_the_doctor_quarantine/ 

On March 12th Jon Nevett writes: "In an utterly surprising move, ICANN staff and the Board's New gTLD Program Committee ("NGPC") recently informed the applicants for .DOCTOR that it has singled out the gTLD as a test case for controlling content and limiting speech on the Internet."

The following jpeg is from the March 12, 2015 pdf at:

       https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/reconsideration-request-15-3-brice-trail-llc-redacted-12mar15-en.pdf

<Mail Attachment.png>