Hi Anna,

Thanks for flagging this. I have read the proposed policy and it needs serious work. So yes, I think we should submit a public comment on this matter as the NCSG (we cannot as the NCUC) if only because I believe we should provide input into all requests for public comment. However, I am not certain we currently have a common position on this issue. In the months after Marrakech, my recollection is that our GNSO Councillors could not come together and reach a consensus on the proposed changes to ICANN's Expected Standards of Behaviour, and there were good reasons for that. Sooo... we should submit a comment here. But I hope the comment we submit is one which is consistent with the positions for which the NCSG has consistently advocated for; values of due process, procedural fairness, and so forth.



Ayden Férdeline
[linkedin.com/in/ferdeline](http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline)



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] ICANN Community Anti-Harassment Policy Comment Period
Local Time: 8 November 2016 8:29 AM
UTC Time: 8 November 2016 08:29
From: [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]




Good evening,


I received notice of that the public comment period for the I[CANN Community anti-harassment policy](https://www.icann.org/public-comments/anti-harassment-policy-2016-11-07-en) began November 7th. I would be interested in organizing the drafting of an NCUC comment if that has not already begun.


Best,


Anna Loup





--






Masters in Public Diplomacy '16