NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:39:50 +0900
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1049 bytes) , text/html (1464 bytes)
Dear Jorge,

it is just one idea among others, nobody can determine the outcome of
working group. the wg members will discuss what they want to do :)

Rafik

2010/3/21 Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>

> > within NCSG/NCUC the discussion was more about pricing and to prove that
> is
> > feasible and possible to run a registry fairly reaching all requirements
> in
> > cheap way than expected by ICANN. that is why we want to learn from ccTLD
> > experience.
>
> If you are already defining what the outcome/goal of the working group
> has to be, there is no reason for a working group.
>
> I thought the idea was to put together an exercise to determine
> regardless of what ICANN says or other expect, an overall idea of what
> it takes in terms of costs to run a registry, there may be different
> scenarios, like DIY or outsource, many documented assumptions and
> variables.
>
> But if the idea is just to find proof that what somebody said was
> incorrect or not very well founded there is no reason to waste time
> forming a working group.
>
> Just MHO.
>
> Regards
> Jorge
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2