Is not right to always presume that the "default" for transparency and
accountability is openness?
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Note: people were told it was being recorded and had assumed people had no problem with that. We did not explicitly mention that a transcirpt would be made available.
>
> I would also like to ask the question in general:
>
> Do people accept that these policy discussions be recorded and that the recordings and transcripts be made public?
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>
