NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:52:00 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Is not right to always presume that the "default" for transparency and
accountability is openness?

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
> Note:  people were told  it was being recorded and had assumed people had no problem with that.  We did not explicitly mention that a transcirpt would be made available.
>
> I would also like to ask the question in general:
>
> Do people accept that these policy discussions be recorded and that the recordings and transcripts be made public?
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2