NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (iPhone Mail 8L1)
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
"Carlos A. Afonso" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:20:13 -0300
Reply-To:
Marcelo Fernandes <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Marcelo Fernandes <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (108 lines)
Same 

-- 

abraços,

marcelo fernandes

81 9668-0086
@mfc1805 

fishy:
81 3325.9389
http://www.fishy.com.br
http://www.muqueca.blog.br
@fishybr

hostbits:
http://www.hostbits.com.br
@hostbits 

Blog: marcelofernandes.blog.br 
Skype: marcelo-fernandes
Facebook: facebook.com/marcelofernandes
Flickr: flickr.com/photos/srbatata 


Em 18/08/2011, às 08:13, "Carlos A. Afonso" <[log in to unmask]> escreveu:

> Well, triple-checked my email and never got the ballot... :(
> 
> --c.a.
> 
> On 08/18/2011 08:03 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Somewhat.  I do not have the latest count of who voted.  
>> I will probably request one at the end of this week since we still have one more week to go. Until 26 August.
>> I try not to ask too often as it creates more work for the people managing the vote.
>> Though, many people have told me privately that they have now voted so I am taking heart from that for the moment.
>> 
>> For anyone who is postponing their vote, until they have had a chance to explore the difference in detail between the docs and who does not wish to do a difference check themselves, I have created a Word based compare-documents document.  It can be found on the NCSG wiki page at: 
>> 
>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/8945698/diif-Board_approved_NCSG+-approved.doc?version=1&modificationDate=1313626105000
>> 
>> or
>> 
>> http://is.gd/wbE4bP
>> 
>> I know that I discussed these on the list over the last years, but I am sure not everyone paid attention or remembers.  Also I am not sure how many people read the intermediate versions that were posted throughout the process - though I know some did, for I would periodically receive comments and question.
>> 
>> In any case I probably should have done this earlier and not waited for 2 voters to ask for it, but …
>> 
>> But if the absence of this comparison doc was the reason for any active member of the charter ballot voting list to avoid voting, that reason should now be alleviated.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> a.
>> 
>> PS. 
>> 
>> Back to my last day of holiday in Edinburgh before starting the 2 day trek back home.  
>> Plan to check out the art festival and have tickets for 2 shows tonight.
>> 
>> http://www.edfringe.com/whats-on/theatre/fragments-of-ash
>> http://www.edfringe.com/whats-on/theatre/female-hitchhiker-the-truth-about-getting-around-free
>> 
>> and maybe catch another performance at: 
>> 
>> http://home.dancebase.co.uk/
>> 
>> I better get going.
>> 
>> On 17 Aug 2011, at 19:07, Nicolas Adam wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> Have things improved since?
>>> 
>>> Nicolas,
>>> ncuc
>>> 
>>> On 8/15/2011 4:43 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> At the last check, among those on the active member list who were sent ballots
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -  the reps of 7 large organizations have not yet voted on the charter  - 28 votes
>>>> 
>>>> -  the reps of 10 small organizations have not yet voted on the charter - 20 votes
>>>> 
>>>> -  23 individuals have not yet voted on the charter - 23 votes
>>>> 
>>>> That's 71 missing votes.
>>>> 
>>>> That is 71 votes effectively against the new charter
>>>> 
>>>> That is a 45% vote against the charter.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> a.
>>> 
>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2