NCSG

CPH would like to discuss the topics below:

The CPH looks forward to working together with the community in a
constructive and collaborative manner to develop the groundwork for
potential future policy work. We acknowledge the NCSG submitted the
following observations during the public comment period with respect to the
new contract obligations. Among these topics were: the change of
terminology from DNS Security Threats to DNS Abuse, the inclusion of Spam
as delivery mechanism, and the open-ended nature of the mitigation measures.



Keeping these specific issues in mind, under what circumstances will you
consider that the Amendments were successful? What metrics in your opinion
will need to be collected to determine success?



More broadly, a year from now, what are your expectations regarding the
impact of the new contract obligations?


Best regards,


Farzaneh


On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 2:51 AM farzaneh badii <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> End of last year I sent this mailing list and those who had expressed
> interest the invitation to the CPH-NCSG DNS abuse outreach, which will
> happen next week.  I suggest as many of you attend the meeting.
>
> I have asked the CPH for an agenda they also want to know what we want to
> bring to the table to discuss. I suggest the following:
> 1. DNS abuse and Human Rights Impact Assessment
> 2. Why is CPH doing another round of outreach? How can we be ensured that
> at least we get a response to our feedback and public comments?
> 3. Third party security vendors and transparency in DNS abuse discussions
>
> Please weigh in if you want to add anything or if you have any questions.
> I will send their proposed agenda as soon as they send it to me.
>
> Best regards
>
>
> Farzaneh
>