Hi all,

Thanks for this nomination, and to Avri for posting this on the discuss
list.

Here are the criteria we agreed to apply to this selection:

Knowledge of Internet governance substantive issues, processes, players -
and political 'nous' to understand agendas
Knowledge of how IANA actually works
Time to commit to it - process likely to be time-consuming
Commitment to pro-actively feed back to the NCSG and transmit our views
back to the transition coordination group
Commitment to help communicating to broader groups in our community

All the best,

Maria


On 25 June 2014 10:12, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> +1 to our ethos embodier
>
> On Jun 25, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is being discussed on the NCSG Policy list, but I think it ought to
> > also be discussed here.
> >
> > I have nominated Milton, my long time argument foil (we disagree as much
> > as we agree) - and friend for the role on the IANA Transition
> > Coordination group.
> >
> > I cannot think of anyone else who
> >
> > - better understands the issue
> > - better understands the needs of the NCSG
> > - who has greater influence in this area
> > - or who has been more dedicated for as long to non commercial causes at
> > ICANN
> >
> > I hope he gets the support of our membership so that the PC feels able
> > to pick him for the role.
> >
> > avri
>