NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
TI_CIPPIC <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TI_CIPPIC <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:34:55 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1059 bytes) , text/html (1454 bytes)
Hi there,

We are well beyond the halcyon days of the early net. It is now no 
difficult thing for law enforcement and those wishing to enforce private 
claims to get at identities behind domain names these days.  Surely, you 
are aware these entities have many readily available tools at their 
disposal to get such things.

I imagine that 'skewing' towards privacy would require something /more 
/protective of privacy than the status quo under most state laws....I 
don't think this is the case, nor will it be if registrars voluntarily 
hold this info back. I'd say the balance has already been struck by 
domestic legislatures/courts. Why upset that balance?


On 1/23/2012 11:52 AM, McTim wrote:
> Which balance? today's (which IMHO is skewed towards "privacy") or
> that of the earlier halcyon days of the network which were too
> transparent for today's tastes (apparently)?
>
> If you use Internet resources you have a responsibility to be
> contactable regarding the (mis)use of that resource.  We (ICANNistas)
> are not ensuring that responsibility is being upheld lately.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2