NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joy Liddicoat <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Joy Liddicoat <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Sep 2015 21:10:42 +1200
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2263 bytes) , text/html (6 kB)
Thank you Milton,
I agree with the proposed new language 

Joy Liddicoat
Sent from my phone 



> On 8/09/2015, at 14:28, Mueller, Milton L <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> OK, I have made some minor modifications based on these discussions, the only significant one related to human rights. The new language reads:
>  
> The CCWG solicits comments on two different ways of formulating ICANN’s commitment to human rights. Option one expressed ICANN’s commitment “to respect the fundamental human rights of the exercise of free expression and the free flow of information.” Option 2 expressed ICANN’s commitment more broadly, “Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will be committed to respect internationally recognized fundamental human rights.”
>  
> With one member organization exception, NCSG tends toward support for the second, more general formulation. The first formulation is too limited because other human rights, such as privacy, are relevant to ICANN policies. We do, however, recognize that a generic reference to human rights might not work as effectively as more specific requirements, and that freedom of expression and privacy are two human rights most directly relevant to ICANN’s policy activity. Our preference, therefore, would be to formulate the commitment this way:
> 
> “Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will be committed to respect internationally recognized fundamental human rights, in particular freedom of expression and privacy.”
>  
> I hope the policy committee can approve the whole document and get it submitted to the CCWG public comment period tomorrow.
>  
> --MM
>  
> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of William Drake
> Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 7:35 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] CCWG comments last call
>  
>  
> On Sep 7, 2015, at 11:22 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>  
> compromise phrasing like "... human rights, in particular
> freedom of expression and privacy" might work.
>  
> Works for me, per the F2F discussions with other stakeholders since summer 2014.
>  
> Bill


ATOM RSS1 RSS2