Hi Avri,
Thanks for providing the clarification. Wew! It's interesting; that names
which makes internet experience more fun cannot be said to be fun in it's
governance. Lots of governance layers. ;)
Ponder: Why is the naming world so seemingly complicated compared to IP
world... one could only wonder if it's a deliberate act.
Cheers!
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 9 Jul 2014 22:23, "Avri Doria" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The RSEP is the policy process by which exceptions in the policies
> governing a Registry are made. Using the RESP is part of the policy, so
> that one size fits all policy can be altered to fit specific cases.
>
> This RSEP request is currently in comment period. After recommendations
> will be made to the Board which has the ultimate authority to decide.
>
> Process is defined in
> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/policy-bd-2012-02-25-en
>
> avri
>
>
>
>
> On 09-Jul-14 17:03, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> > Perhaps someone could care to educate me further on how things work in
> > ICANN. If a request as the one contained in this announcement is
> > received by ICANN, do they review such proposal based on the existing
> > policies? and if they do, and determine that a proposal does not fit
> > into existing policy/guidelines, is it right for ICANN staff to suggest
> > updating existing processes to allow a proposal go through?
> >
> > This is the way I understood this particular call and I hope someone can
> > confirm that my understanding is incorrect.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > sent from Google nexus 4
> > kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> >
> > __
> > ICANN <http://www.icann.org/>
> >
> >
> > News Alert
> >
> > https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-07-08-en
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names for .DEALS, XN--FJQ720A,
> > .CITY, .XYZ, .COLLEGE, .GOP, .TRADE, .WEBCAM, .BID, .HEALTHCARE,
> > .WORLD, .BAND
> >
> > 8 July 2014
> >
> >
> >
> > *Forum Announcement:* Comment Period Opens on *Date:*
> 8 July 2014
> > *Categories/Tags:*
> >
> > o Top-Level Domains
> > o Second-Level Domains
> > o Contracted Party Agreements
> > o Security/Stability
> >
> > *Purpose (Brief):*
> >
> > Six (6) Registry Services Evaluation Process (RSEP) requests were
> > submitted by the registry operators listed below to allow the
> > introduction of two-character domain names for the below TLDs. In total,
> > the requests concern 12 New gTLDs.
> >
> > Proposal TLD Registry Name Documents
> > 2014027 healthcare
> > world
> > band Binky Lake, LLC* Binky Lake, LLC Request 25 June 2014
> > <
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/binky-lake-healthcare-world-band-request-25jun14-en.pdf
> >
> > [PDF, 16 KB]
> > 2014024 trade
> > webcam
> > bid Elite Registry Limited Elite Registry Limited Request 16 June 2014
> > <
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/elite-registry-trade-request-16jun14-en.pdf
> >
> > [PDF, 16 KB]
> > 2014023 gop Republican State Leadership Committee, Inc.
> Republican
> > State Leadership Committee, Inc. Request 12 June 2014
> > <
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rslc-gop-request-12jun14-en.pdf
> >
> > [PDF, 15 KB]
> > 2014022 xyz
> > college XYZ.COM <http://XYZ.COM>, LLC XYZ.COM, LLC Request 12
> June
> > 2014
> > <
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/xyz-xyz-college-request-12jun14-en.pdf
> >
> > [PDF, 18 KB]
> > 2014016 city Binky Lake, LLC* Binky Lake, LLC Request 6
> June 2014
> > <
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/binky-lake-city-request-06jun14-en.pdf
> >
> > [PDF, 16 KB]
> > 2014015 deals
> > xn--fjq720a Binky Lake, LLC* Binky Lake, LLC Request 6 June 2014
> > <
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/binky-lake-deals-forsale-xn--fjq720a-request-06jun14-en.pdf
> >
> > [PDF, 16 KB]
> >
> > *Note: Binky Lake, LLC has submitted three RSEP requests on behalf of
> > Donuts, Inc. for 6 gTLDs
> >
> > As part of these requests, each registry operator described which
> > two-character domain names for which it would offer these registrations.
> > These RSEP requests were posted for public information on the Registry
> > Service Evaluation Process webpage, available at
> > https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rsep-2014-02-19-en.
> >
> > As required by the Registry Services Evaluation Policy
> > <https://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/rsep.html>, ICANN has
> > undertaken a preliminary determination on whether the proposals might
> > raise significant competition, security or stability issues. ICANN's
> > preliminary review (based on the information provided) did not identify
> > any such issues for these requests.
> >
> > Implementation of the proposal would require amendments to the Exhibit
> > A, Approved Services of the respective Registry Agreements, which are
> > being posted for public comment.
> >
> > *Public Comment Box Link:*
> > https://www.icann.org/public-comments/two-char-new-gtld-2014-07-08-en
> > <https://www.icann.org//public-comments/two-char-new-gtld-2014-07-08-en>
> >
> >
> >
> > This message was sent to [log in to unmask]
> > <mailto:[log in to unmask]> from:
> >
> > ICANN News Alert | [log in to unmask]
> > <mailto:[log in to unmask]> | ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite
> > 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
> >
> >
> >
> > Email Marketing by iContact - Try It Free!
> > <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
> >
> > Manage Your Subscription
> > <
> http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=16602946&l=6333&s=B8V4&m=941459&c=165637
> >
> >
> >
>
|
