While it is always good to get fresh faces at the table I agree that this
task is not for the faint hearted - or so it appears.
The PC would surely select a person based on the several criteria necessary
for the position.
regards
Karel DOUGLAS
On 3 December 2016 at 23:52, Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> and especially those who volunteered for this ccwg, please reply to
> the questions below without delay. The PC has to decide this on Monday
> and it would be nice to have some time to think about it.
>
> Don't be discouraged by some comments that make it sound like this is
> an impossibly hard task. There's no need to write page-long essays
> or treat this like a job application for your dream job, just quick
> points you can jot down in ten minutes.
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
>
> On Dec 03 16:26, matthew shears ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>
> > REMINDER
> >
> > We need a volunteer to take on this important role and welcome additional
> > expressions of interest.
> >
> > For those who apply, and have applied, please take 10 minutes to respond
> to
> > the questions outlined below.
> >
> > Deadline for selection is December 5th!
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Matthew
> >
> >
> > On 01/12/2016 09:23, matthew shears wrote:
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > To borrow from the email from James it is important for the PC to be
> > > able to select wisely from among those who are interested. Please
> > > provide ample information about yourself, and importantly what skills
> > > specific you would bring to the WG so that the PC is able to make the
> > > very best decision.
> > >
> > > For guidance, and as a member of the PC, l would ask that those who are
> > > interested please include in their expression of interest information
> > > responding to the following (drawn from the e-mail transmitted by
> > > Tapani):
> > >
> > > * Provide your motivation for wanting this role
> > > * Indicate that you have sufficient and appropriate knowledge and
> > > expertise to participate in the substance of the work of the
> > > CCWG. For example, and borrowing from James e-mail again,
> > > _please describe in detail your skills and expertise relevant to
> > > this particular WG_ and specifically any knowledge of finance,
> > > business, non-profit administration and potentially an
> > > understanding of laws around non-profits.
> > > * Indicate your ability and commitment to participate in the
> > > activities of the CCWG on an ongoing basis (CCWGs require
> > > considerable time and effort).
> > > * Describe your prior experience at ICANN, how you have participated
> > > in a CCWG or similar, and how you have contributed to the goals
> > > of NCSG, etc., and how you solicited, reported back and
> > > communicated (where appropriate) the views and concerns of
> > > individuals in the organization that appointed you.
> > > * Describe your experience and degree of knowledge of the needs of
> > > the Internet communities that ICANN serves (standards, domains and
> > > numbers) and well as your understanding of the broader ecosystem
> > > of the Internet Community) in which ICANN operates.
> > >
> > > This information and any other relevant information you wish to share
> > > will be critical to the PCs decision - all the more so given the very
> > > tight deadline.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your understanding.
> > >
> > > Matthew
> > >
> > > On 01/12/2016 07:34, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > > We need to appoint someone fot the new gTLD Auction Proceeds CWG.
> > > > Deadline is next Monday (Dec 5).
> > > >
> > > > Take a look at the description below and if you think you could do
> it,
> > > > please come forward.
> > > >
> > > > Tapani Tarvainen
> > > > (en route to Guadalajara, online only intermittently today and
> tomorrow,
> > > > apologies for slow reactions to emails)
> > > >
> > > > ----- Forwarded message -----
> > > >
> > > > > From: Marika Konings<[log in to unmask]>
> > > > > Date: 30 November 2016 at 17:52:46 GMT
> > > > > To:"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > > Subject: [council] Reminder - each SG to identify one member for
> new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear All,
> > > > > As a reminder, please note that each Stakeholder Group has been
> requested to identify one (1) member for the new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG
> by 5 December. Per the charter, best efforts should be made to ensure that
> members:
> > > > > Have sufficient and appropriate motivation (and ideally expertise)
> to participate in the substance of the work of the CCWG. Appropriate
> experience could, for example, include experience with allocation and final
> disbursement of funds;
> > > > > Commit to actively participate in the activities of the CCWG on an
> on-going and long-term basis;
> > > > > Solicit and communicate (where appropriate) the views and concerns
> of individuals in the organization that appoints them;
> > > > > Commit to abide to the charter when participating in the CCWG;
> > > > > Understand the needs of the Internet communities that ICANN serves
> (standards, domains and numbers);
> > > > > Understand the broader ecosystem (the Internet Community) in which
> ICANN operates and the needs of those working on other aspects of the
> Internet industry, including those not yet connected.
> > > > > The Charter furthermore notes in relation to Chartering
> Organization appointed members that:
> > > > > In addition to the role that Chartering Organization appointed
> members have in relation to potential consensus calls or decisions (see
> below), they are expected to serve as a liaison between their respective
> Chartering Organization and the CCWG. Members must, if and when necessary,
> ensure that the Chartering Organizations are kept up to date on the
> progress and deliberations of the CCWG as well as sharing any input from
> the Chartering Organization with the CCWG.
> > > > > Chartering Organizations are encouraged as part of the CCWG member
> selection process, to take into account how appointed members can better
> contribute from a diversity of viewpoints. This can be achieved by looking
> at the cultural, geographic, industry, knowledge and expertise diversity as
> well as gender balance of Chartering Organizations appointed members.
> > > > > Chartering Organizations are encouraged to use open and inclusive
> processes when selecting their members for a CCWG and this should include
> reasonable efforts to ensure that each of ICANN’s five regions is
> represented.
> > > > > As noted in the resolution from ICANN57, ‘The GNSO Council expects
> to select a GNSO Co-Chair for the CCWG from the slate of GNSO appointed
> members to the CCWG during its meeting on 15 December 2016’.
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Marika
> > > > > Marika Konings
> > > > > Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet
> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> > > > > Email:[log in to unmask] Follow the GNSO via Twitter
> > > > > @ICANN_GNSO
> > > > > Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and
> visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.
> > > > ----- End forwarded message -----
> > >
> > > --
> > > ------------
> > > Matthew Shears
> > > Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> > > Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
> > > + 44 771 2472987
> >
> > --
> > ------------
> > Matthew Shears
> > Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> > Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
> > + 44 771 2472987
> >
>
|
