NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:54:27 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 kB) , text/html (24 kB)
Hi,

I totally have to agree with Marilia here. This is a political economy question, hence it needs to be addressed at policy decision level (if only in addition to other types of provisions.)

Once upon a time way before the development of the current policy for new gTLDs was completed, a few of us (Avri included) then at the GNSO Council were pushing for a similar or closely related agenda. At the time the focus was on the cost of new gTLD application and other entry barriers to the registry industry, which might weigh heavier beyond feasibility on developing regions' potential applicants. The proposal for a funds-in-trust emerged at that time to help lower the costs for such applicants (Avri may rectify in case I'm being abused by my memory.) While I haven't been able to keep up with the detail of the current situation in that regard, the question being raised by Marilia is in line with the same agenda, I would think.

Thanks,

Mawaki

Sent from TypeMail



On Sep 29, 2015, 1:08 AM, at 1:08 AM, Marilia Maciel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Dear Carlos,
>
>I agree that we should raise this issue in the GNSO meeting with GDD.
>However, I also see value in making a question about this topic to the
>board. By doing that we are sending a clear message that this issue is
>considered a high priority in our SG and we are giving it much more
>visibility. A question to GDD does not have the same political
>importance.
>Moreover, GDD is staff, is technical, and I believe this issue has a
>strong
>political component that makes it a good candidate to be a "board
>question". Finally, I already asked these questions to Atallah when he
>was
>here for the launch of .Rio a couple of weeks ago and the answers were
>evasive. I think it is time to take a shot with the board if others
>believe
>this is an important issue.
>
>Best!
>Marília
>
>
>
>On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
><[log in to unmask]>
>wrote:
>
>> Dear marilia
>>
>> Very timely and interesting question
>> But I would rather put it directly to Mr. Attala in the session with
>the
>> GDD President. He has to give a clear answer on this question. The
>Board
>> may remain at a very general level.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>> _____________________
>>
>> email: [log in to unmask]
>> Skype: carlos.raulg
>> +506 8837 7173 (cel)
>> +506 4000 2000 (home)
>> +506 2290 3678 (fax)
>> _____________________
>> Apartado 1571-1000
>> San Jose, COSTA RICA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 28, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Marilia Maciel <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I would like to support the topics suggested by Niels and Remmy,
>but I
>> would take Remmy's point in a slightly different direction.
>>
>> Nielsen's report confirms that Latin America, Asia and Africa will
>likely
>> be the great drivers of new gTLD acceptance and use, while most
>registries
>> are still based in developed regions. There is a net transference of
>> resources taking place from the developing to the developed world in
>the
>> DNS industry. The problems that developing regions face have been
>> extensively explained.  What is the perception of the board? In the
>opinion
>> of board members, which concrete measures could be put in place? Why
>not
>> even suggestions from the JAS report have been implemented yet? Would
>the
>> board commit to a clear plan to address the current imbalances before
>a new
>> round of applications is launched?
>>
>> My two cents.
>>
>> Best,
>> Marília
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Remmy Nweke <[log in to unmask]>
>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rafik
>>> Can we ask the board on what the future holds on the use of the
>consumer
>>> survey conducted recently by Nielsen to improve trust of common
>Internet
>>> users or consumers especially in developing economies where service
>>> providers hide under poor infrastructure to rip off data users.
>>> regards
>>> Remmy Nweke
>>>
>>>
>>> ____
>>> REMMY NWEKE,  Lead Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
>>> DigitalSENSE Africa Media Ltd [*Multiple-award winning medium*]
>>> (DigitalSENSE Business News
>>> <http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; ITREALMS
>>> <http://www.itrealms.com.ng/>, NaijaAgroNet
>>> <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng/>)
>>> Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza, Bolade Junction,
>Oshodi-Lagos
>>> M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, 8051000475, T: @ITRealms
>>> <http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
>>> Author: A Decade of ICT Reportage in Nigeria
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/adecadeofictreportageinnigeria%E2%80%8E>
>>> NDSF 2016
>>>
><https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153112418861429&set=a.119216361428.104226.716351428&type=1>
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> *Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and
>>> attachments are confidential and may also be privileged information.
>It is
>>> intended only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does
>not
>>> accept legal responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you
>are not
>>> the intended recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete
>this
>>> document and do not disclose the contents of this document to any
>other
>>> person, nor make any copies. Violators may face court persecution.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Stephanie Perrin <
>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes Nora briefed the GNSO, and I asked about getting access to her
>>>> research.  She said she would post a wiki, but they have not done
>any
>>>> research outside ICANN yet, apparently.  Makes one wonder how we
>actually
>>>> determine "the public interest".
>>>> Stephanie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2015-09-28 12:30, Robin Gross wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Can we ask the board how it is coming with its research in the
>"global
>>>> public interest".  I believe it was the annual mtg last where we
>asked the
>>>> board about its understanding of the global public interest, how it
>>>> determines, on what basis, etc.  At that time, the board said it
>was just
>>>> getting started on compiling some research that it would share and
>had
>>>> hired Nora.  So it would be great if we could have an update or
>further
>>>> conversation on this concept, how it is determined and applies,
>etc.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Robin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 28, 2015, at 7:47 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> less than 3 weeks before Dublin meeting,need your input here :)
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> 2015-09-21 7:04 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak < <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> [log in to unmask]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone.
>>>>>
>>>>> As described below, we should agree on 3 topics we would like to
>>>>> discuss with the board at the session in dublin meeting.
>>>>> Please propose a topic and give some description.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>
>>>>> Ps please fill out this doodle poll about your attendance of
>dublin
>>>>> meeting <http://doodle.com/5umpi4cf2r2ue2dy>
>>>>> http://doodle.com/5umpi4cf2r2ue2dy
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: "Rafik Dammak" <
><[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Date: Sep 14, 2015 9:00 PM
>>>>> Subject: [ICANN meeting] kick-off the preparation for ICANN
>meeting 53
>>>>> in Dublin
>>>>> To: "[log in to unmask]"
><[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> we are just few weeks away from the next ICANN meeting in Dublin
>and we
>>>>> have to be ready for that.
>>>>>
>>>>> First thing is to start the discussion about the topics we want to
>>>>> discuss with the board during our joint meeting (f*or Dublin, it
>will
>>>>> scheduled in Wednesday morning instead of Tuesday* as usual)
>>>>>
>>>>> Please share some topics for discussion and give some description
>to
>>>>> explain the rationale. we will try to shorten the list up to 3
>topics and
>>>>> continue the discussion about those topics and how to present them
>in order
>>>>> to get interaction.
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally, please fill the doodle poll  (here
>>>>> http://doodle.com/5umpi4cf2r2ue2dy)if you are going to attend the
>>>>> ICANN meeting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Marília Maciel*
>> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito
>Rio
>> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV
>Law
>> School
>> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>>
>> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
>> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
>> Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" -
>> http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>*Marília Maciel*
>Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito
>Rio
>Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
>School
>http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>
>DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
>PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
>Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" -
>http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en


ATOM RSS1 RSS2