NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Aug 2014 16:44:05 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (948 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Very nice.
On 14-08-08 2:01 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached the working draft of RySG position/statement and not yet 
> official. it will gives us an idea what are their concerns.
>
> Rafik
>
>
> 2014-08-09 2:23 GMT+09:00 Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask] 
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>:
>
>     Right. The point here is the unity among SG’s, not a complete and
>     accurate description of our own (NCSG) concerns.
>
>     *From:*NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]
>     <mailto:[log in to unmask]>] *On Behalf Of *Nicolas Adam
>     *Sent:* Friday, August 08, 2014 1:28 PM
>     *To:* [log in to unmask]
>     <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>     *Subject:* Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Fairly Urgent: Possible Joint
>     Statement on Accountability
>
>     To clarify my previous point: if that not yet aligned letter is
>     what we can expect to get in time, than I am supporting that NCSG
>     supports it.
>
>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2