NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:44:54 +0900
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1020 bytes) , text/html (2138 bytes)
Hello,

Thanks Brenden for pointing that. all these technical requirements are not
at the end contradictory to free market and competition as they looks like
technical barrier similar to which is applied in many countries to ban
technology import?

Rafik

2010/3/19 Brenden Kuerbis <[log in to unmask]>

>
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> You will also find some discussion in the proposed registry contract
>> section 2.9:
>>
>> http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/draft-agreement-specs-clean-04oct09-en.pdf
>>
>> (BTW: I have been told that this is worth reviewing for lots of reasons -
>> and that those among us who are contract savvy could find lots f things to
>> comment on in this document)
>>
>>
>
> Agree, there is a lot to be concerned about.  I wrote about Specification
> 6, particularly requirements for implementing protocols that do not have
> wide acceptance in the market, here:
>
> http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2010/1/8/4421904.html
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> a.
>>
>>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2