NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:58:53 +0900
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (743 bytes) , text/html (1353 bytes)
more Olympic rights fun <
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/apr/13/olympics-2012-branding-police-sponsors>
 Bit off topic.

Adam



On Monday, April 16, 2012, Avri Doria wrote:

> Hi,
>
> What's to discuss?
> We presented arguments.
> And they were heard.
>
> Avri
>
> Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask] <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> >I am surprised there is not more discussion of these resolutions on
> >this list.
> >The good news is that in both cases, the board’s action coincides with
> >NCSG positions, and in the case of the second resolution, I think our
> >work played a role in making the decision.
> >
> >My analysis of the board resolutions here:
> >
> http://www.internetgovernance.org/2012/04/14/when-no-action-is-the-wisest-action-icann-does-good/
> >
> >
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2