NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:41:39 -0800
Reply-To:
Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
I make the point including some humor to demonstrate the flaws of 
empowering trademark holders too much. I use myself and my own trademark 
as an example of why people like me should NOT be empowered.

On 1/21/2012 8:36 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> On 21 Jan 2012, at 23:16, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>> If I control REALITY on the Internet - wouldn't that make me a deity?
> i think the extension of trademark into theology is further afield than even the IPC and the other friends of marking common words for usurption  would go.
>
> While I favor adding comments along the lines that Kathy and Timothe suggest, I hope we can avoid going this far.  I certainly hope we avoid Theology and Deification as sub themes.  I actually also hope we can avoid giving any support for the trademark of common language words that should be protected from marking as part of the cultural commons.
>
> I will avoid, except for this single sentence, discussions of the category error involved in confusing the word 'reality' for the actuality of reality.
>
> avri
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2