Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:44:24 -0500 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree with McTim ;).
Nicolas
On 22/12/2011 8:44 AM, McTim wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> .
> .
> .
>
> I tend to think we should be removing names, such as ICANN/IANA
> etc, from the reserved list, not adding them. But we had a WG
> during the new gTLD PDP that did not make these decisions - either
> for adding or deleting. So I find all of the efforts to add
> names now, problematic and to be avoided unless we open up a PDP
> process that looks at the entire issue again, including all the
> geo names that ICANN has forced onto the list without a PDP to
> authorize the action.
>
>
>
> I agree with Avri.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
|
|
|