NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:02:06 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2203 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Hi everyone,

Just a quick reminder to please send your individual feedback on the below issue to Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> asap so she can feed it back to the drafting team.  Or (of course) continue to post your individual comments to this list and she'll see them here and we can continue a lively discussion on the issue.

Thanks,
Robin

On Jul 18, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Avri Doria wrote:

> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Brian Peck <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS
>> Date: 18 July 2012 11:08:58 EDT
>> To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
>> 
>> In response to the request during the last RC/IOC DT call, please find below a list of possible approaches that have been proposed to date for moving forward in responding to the GAC proposal to protect the RCRC and IOC names at the second level in new gTLDS:
>> 
>> Maintain the status quo and not provide any new special protections for the RCRC/IOC names (i.e., no changes to the current schedule of second-level reserved names in the new gTLD Registry Agreement).
>> Develop recommendations to implement the GAC proposal such as extending protection to all or a subset of RCRC names only, all or a subset of IOC names only or, to both sets of each organization’s names.
>> Consider the proposal to not provide any new protections now and wait to see if any additional protections may be necessary after the delegation of the first round new gTLD strings and/or consider lowering costs for each organization to utilize RPMs ( i.e., Thomas Rickert’s proposal)
>> Consider possible additional protections for the RCRC/IOC as part of a broader PDP on the protection of names for international organizations
>> Ask ICANN General Counsel’s office to conduct a legal analysis to substantiate/verify whether there is clear evidence of treaty law and/or statutes that would require registries and registrars to protect IOC and RCRC names by law.  
>> 
>> Please let us know if you have any questions or need anything further at this time.  Thanks.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> Brian 
>> 
>> Brian Peck
>> Policy Director
>> ICANN
> 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2