Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:27:09 -0700 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear NCSG PC Members:
Can NCSG PC support these comments that were submitted by a group of NCSG members last week? We've got a short timeframe for submitting the endorsement, so can we spend a moment to consider this in the next day or two please?
Thank you,
Robin
On Aug 22, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] NCSG Privacy group submission on the EWG
>> Date: August 22, 2013 9:53:35 AM PDT
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Reply-To: Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Members of the NCSG Privacy group <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/privacy> have submitted the following comments to the gTLD Service model comment period.
>>
>> Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services Who on the EWG Specializes in Abuse of the Whois Data? Kathy Kleiman
>> Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services We Strongly Object to a Centralized Whois/Registrant Data Database; What were Plans B and C? Kathy Kleiman
>> Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services Why is the Whois Broken? Kathy Kleiman
>> Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services The EWG Use Cases Seem Fundamentally Flawed Kathy Kleiman
>> Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services Data Elements Will Require a Separate Review by the ICANN Community Kathy Kleiman
>> Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services Potential Conflict of Interest Edward Morris
>> Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services Has the EWG Evaluated Closely What is at Stake for Registrants? Edward Morris
>> found at: <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/share-24jun13-en.htm>
>>
>> The NCSG PC is being asked to endorse these statements as an NCSG position.
>>
>> The membership is invited to discuss, to send in comments of their own, to inform the Policy Committee through discussions on NCSG-DISCUSS on their views on endorsing these statement, ... whatever really.
>>
>> The Policy Committee has until 6 Sept 13 to send in and endorsement/comments.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> avri
>> written as:
>> Alternate Chair, PC-NCSG
>> Participant in NCSG Policy group
>> a co-signer of the statements
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> [log in to unmask]
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
|
|
|