NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
asare-sakyi george <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
asare-sakyi george <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:06:35 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2577 bytes) , text/html (3733 bytes)
My support for you Avri  and wishing you the best of luck. 
. Ing George Asare Sakyi
Managing Director 
Mont Royal Technologies
Tel: 0203001647
email: [log in to unmask] 




________________________________
From: Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Wed, April 27, 2011 11:15:17 PM
Subject: Re: Election for ICANN Board seat now going on

Hi,

While it might be nice if we did have elections for the Board where all the 
members of the constituencies and stakeholders got to vote, at this point it is 
only the council members in the Non Contracted Parties House who vote.  Though 
who knows for future elections we could propose it - though it might take a 
by-laws change.

In the CSG, as I understand it, the chairs of the constituencies have directed 
how their council members must vote.  Of course they have the choice of obeying 
or not since it is a secret ballot.

In the NCSG, the council members are all free to decide for themselves how they 
will vote.

My hope is that they will decide to vote for me.  And maybe the support they see 
here will help them decide to do so.  


And of course it truly warms my heart to see your support.  I appreciate it 
greatly.

Thanks

a.


On 27 Apr 2011, at 23:59, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:

> Yes, this was what I asked as well.
> 
> --c.a.
> 
> On 04/27/2011 06:48 PM, Dan Krimm wrote:
>> Sure, +1.
>> 
>> Does our input here make a formal difference (is it part of a formal
>> process of electoral polling), or is this just a "resolution of support"?
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, April 27, 2011 2:34 pm, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>>> 1+ for Avri.
>>> 
>>> -J
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -J
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 27, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Glenn Ricart <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --c.a.
>>>> 
>>>> On 04/27/2011 12:24 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>>>> Let me second that motion!
>>>>> In addition to Avri's intrinsic qualifications, there is the need for
>>>> better diversity on the Board - and by that I am not just referring to
>>>> gender but to ideological and policy diversity as well.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The whole purpose of having distinct stakeholder groups in ICANN's
>>>> GNSO is to ensure some kind of balanced representation. So it is
>>>> important that the NCSG members hold together and support one of our
>>>> own for Board seat 14.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --MM
>>> 
>> 


ATOM RSS1 RSS2