NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Aug 2014 16:32:08 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (992 bytes) , text/html (2987 bytes) , signature.asc (505 bytes)
Great statement from the registries.  The GNSO has never been so aligned! 

Thanks,
Robin

On Aug 8, 2014, at 11:01 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> attached the working draft of RySG position/statement and not yet official. it will gives us an idea what are their concerns.
> 
> Rafik 
> 
> 
> 2014-08-09 2:23 GMT+09:00 Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>:
> Right. The point here is the unity among SG’s, not a complete and accurate description of our own (NCSG) concerns.
> 
>  
> 
> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nicolas Adam
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 1:28 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Fairly Urgent: Possible Joint Statement on Accountability
> 
>  
> 
> To clarify my previous point: if that not yet aligned letter is what we can expect to get in time, than I am supporting that NCSG supports it.
> 
>  
> 
> 
> <Draft Public Comment on ICANN Proposal - DRAFT NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE.docx>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2