NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Schaefer, Brett" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Schaefer, Brett
Date:
Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:50:00 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2683 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
I think this is a valid concern. +1





________________________________

Brett Schaefer

Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs

Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy

The Heritage Foundation

214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE

Washington, DC 20002

202-608-6097

heritage.org<http://heritage.org/>



On Jun 15, 2016, at 6:33 PM, avri doria <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:



Hi,



Would like to get the NCSG range of views on ICANN's plan/rationale for

secondment of all PTI staff in perpetuity.



The position I have taken personally is:



- I accept that in the initial instance, in consideration of the current

employees and of stability, it makes sense to second those IANA

employees that wish to the PTI.



- with the exception of the PTI managerPresident (if they happen to be

the same person) who I feel might have a conflict of interest in terms

of ICANN the employer and PTI the fiduciary responsibility. I think that

from day 0, this executive level employee should be a PTI employee

reporting solely to the PTI board.



- i think that replacement staff should be employed by PTI and not

ICANN. there is an issue with having two sort of employees, those

seconded from day 0 and new employees, but as long as staff are treated

well and equitably this shouldn't be a problem.



The CWG proposal did not get into this, though I think many of us

thought at the time that PTI staff would be PTI employees as part of the

separability formula.



avri







-------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject: [IOTF] Rationale for PTI Staffing Recommendations

Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:05:05 +0000

From: Yuko Green <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>







Dear members of the IOTF,







Attached, please find the rationale for PTI staffing recommendations we

have made in the PTI Implementation Approach document. We look forward

to hearing any feedback you may have.







Regards,







*Yuko Green*



Strategic Programs Manager



Global Domains Division



Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)







Direct Line: +1 310 578 8693



Mobile: +1 310 745 1517



E-mail: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>



www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org> <http://www.icann.org/<http://www.icann.org/>>











---

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.

https://www.avast.com/antivirus<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

<PTI Rationale.docx>

<Attached Message Part>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2