Hi

Well I do not think we needed a none of the above to stand against each of the candidates.  I think one of them would have been enough.

ie.

candidate 1
....
candidate n
none of the above.

with everyone having 3 votes and the top 3 winning.

i believe in NOTA, but in moderation.

"Horacio T. Cadiz" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Milton,
> Great that the winners beat "None of the Above."  Next time, how about
>inserting "Some of the Above" as a choice?  Let us see how the
>candidates
>will fare against that.  B-)
>
>
>-- 
>Bombim Cadiz
>*****************************************
>*  Free/Open Source Software (FOSS) --  *
>* No windows. No gates. It is open.     *
>* No Bill. It is Free.                  *
>*****************************************

Avri Doria