Great idea guys, what did you have in mind for the agenda?
Stephanie
On 2016-12-01 06:41, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. wrote:
>
> +1 Klaus
>
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> +506 8837 7176
> Skype: carlos.raulg
> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
> On 1 Dec 2016, at 2:00, Klaus Stoll wrote:
>
> Dear All
>
> I wish we would spend as much time and energy on IG policy making
> topics as we spend time on the merits of various places around the
> world to host an ICANN Intersessional meeting. Can we talk about
> what we need to discuss t the meeting, the goals we want to
> achieve and how to get there. When we do this, the place might not
> be of such an importance.
>
> Yours
>
> Klaus
>
> PS: Kuawi, Hawaii. Definitely!
>
>
>
> On 12/1/2016 1:37 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>> Sam,
>>
>> I don't think it was clear at all that some locations were said
>> "almost in jest". What was made clear, however, on page 14
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Planning+-+Intersessional+2017%3A+Call+details%2C+recordings%2C+transcripts?preview=/63144502/63150133/transcript_ncphpc_291116.pdf>
>> of the transcript, was the instruction to, "Please type
>> [locations] into the chat. No tongue in cheek suggestions,
>> please, because we can’t see or hear your tone when you're typing
>> that in." If that instruction was ignored and our representatives
>> on the call did instead suggest cities not well suited to hosting
>> a meeting such as this one, I'm not sure who they thought they
>> were serving.
>>
>> Ayden Férdeline
>> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>>
>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: NCPH Intersessional timing
>>> Local Time: 1 December 2016 12:24 AM
>>> UTC Time: 1 December 2016 00:24
>>> From: [log in to unmask]
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>> In response to who made the suggestions for a location for the CGPH
>>> Intersession, a review of the session Chat transcript
>>> makes it clear that the names were tossed out at the last
>>> minute, and
>>> some serious and some almost in jest.
>>>
>>> One gets a sense from the overall records of the meeting, that
>>> Reykjavik
>>> remains a front runner.
>>> The decision is supposed to be out on Friday, Dec 2nd.
>>>
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Planning+-+Intersessional+2017%3A+Call+details%2C+recordings%2C+transcripts?preview=/63144502/63150134/acchat_ncphpc_291116_.pdf
>>>
>>> Sam L.
>>
>
|