NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:03:04 -0400
Reply-To:
Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: DIDP Analysis
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
From:
Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
In Canada, when it is, you just have to pay the extra work load and/or 
material to get it, and they offer you to refine your search instead and 
work with you on your request. There is no way that a no is acceptable.

Big item for transparency and accountability IMO.

Nicolas


On 06/10/2015 9:47 AM, Karel Douglas wrote:
> In some jurisdictions this can be a legitimate reason for denial if 
> the request is too burdensome.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2