NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Seun Ojedeji <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Seun Ojedeji <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 9 Aug 2014 11:45:29 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1022 bytes) , text/html (2075 bytes)
Hello Milton,

Are you asking for our comment or endorsement. I don't think it's
appropriate for you to determine the condition for comment neither is it
appropriate to outrightly say the charter is fine.

Just my 2 cent.

Regards

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 8 Aug 2014 22:32, "Milton L Mueller" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>  The IANA stewardship transition coordination group is asking for
> comments if you think there is something seriously wrong with the draft
> charter.
>
> I think the charter is fine as it stands, and am particularly happy with
> the accountability language, so if you want to comment approvingly that is
> great too.
>
> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-08-en
>
>
>
> There is a very short timeline for comment, due to the fact that the draft
> has been circulating for 3 weeks already, so if you want to comment do it
> quick.
>
>
>
> Milton L Mueller
>
> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
>
> Internet Governance Project
>
> http://internetgovernance.org
>
>
>
>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2