Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:29:01 -0400 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Carl Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> The DNS problem and reason for confusion is due to limitations imposed
> during the infancy of development stages of machine inter-connectivity.
> Basically, IP is insufficient to grant each machine a unique identity. The
> limited IP addresses are licensed to master networks which in turn are
> sub-netted to machines which only have a local identity slaved to the
> master.
>
> Ultimately, we need a unique ID for each machine which is not slaved or
> controlled by a master.
>
Is this a DNS issue or an ID/Locator problem?
If so, LISP may be what you want to look at here, not the DNS.
--
Cheers,
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
|
|
|