Ok, I agree with this. We have to ask for an ICANN liaison for the HR work
in WS2 to support the dialogue with ICANN/board. Of course, we don't want
the situation when ICANN will appoint someone who is gonna take over and
rule the issue like it happened with global public interest.
Admitting that we have to be careful.
Cheers
Tanya

On 29 February 2016 at 21:28, Mueller, Milton L <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> So the clarification would be that you want to know which staff person is
> responsible for the HR aspect of Work Stream 2.
> And/or, you want a specialized staff person assigned to that.
> Those are nice practical questions.
> But please! don't frame it as a request to have a staff person "working on
> the development of a human rights policy." WE are supposed to develop the
> HR policy. The staff is supposed to facilitate our work.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > But we want someone in staff who is working on this, right? That is what
> the
> > previous report of the CCWP HR was about [0]. This cannot and should not
> be
> > done either ONLY by the board, ONLY by staff, or ONLY by the community.
> >
> > Whereas we've been having success on board engagement (after the
> > questions of last time), we will need to work more with staff,
> henceforth this
> > question.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Niels
> >
>