NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Date:
Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:14:49 -0500
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Hi,


> nasty closed generics
> vitriol.

hmm.

But, yes, I never thought it would convince you.  And never in my wildest dreams did I ever think you would sign on as part of this group.

And I probably should have said:

"will people who agree with this positon be more inclined to perhaps maybe please sign on, if it is changed?"

thanks

avri


On 5 Mar 2013, at 09:46, Kathy Kleiman wrote:

> Why?  It does not change the positions of the letter (favoring nasty closed generics). But it does change the debate to something more respectful and less vitriol.  Not a reason to sign on - but a reason to support the process of disagreement...
> 
> Kathy
> 
>> Seems a good suggestion to me.
>> 
>> will people sign on if it is changed?
>> 
>> avri

ATOM RSS1 RSS2