Ok, my confusion. The letter sent suggested to me that questions already
existed. Impression I got was SO-AC had a been discussing substantive
issues.

About time SO/AC list had public archive. (Bill, thanks for your
note/effort on this)

Adam



On Sunday, August 31, 2014, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Adam,
>
> SO/AC "leadership" is not discussing any specific questions, since each
> group is supposed to collect its inquiries.  no group shared its questions
> yet.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> 2014-08-31 17:15 GMT+09:00 Adam <[log in to unmask]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[log in to unmask]);>>:
>
>> we are now 5 days into the 7 days for compiling then sending clarifying
>> questions.
>>
>> What questions have the SO/AC leadership been discussing, could we see
>> them.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
>> On Aug 31, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > As indicated in the response from the ICANN CEO and the board (letter
>> attached), they are willing to respond to questions and request for
>> clarification for the accountability process proposal
>> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-4-2014-08-25-en
>> >
>> > While there was no decision made by NCSG policy regarding the
>> joint-letter, I think it is worthy to take this opportunity and asking for
>> clarifications.
>> > so please send your questions to be compiled here
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1X-gZLs35QL-TkJf6Rbyb9mlPS0oMfpi67ZEwXXZt_qA/edit
>> >
>> > We need to do this asap.
>> >
>> > As reminder there is also a "Townhall" session at IGF next Tuesday
>> about ICANN accountability http://goo.gl/sTjkLM .
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Rafik
>> >
>> > <2014-8-28-SO-AC-SG-leaders.pdf>
>>
>
>