NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 May 2013 11:26:24 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (902 bytes) , text/html (1410 bytes)
+1

-J


On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status  refers to it as the
> objection and dispute resolution process:
>
> "Objection and Dispute Resolution The objection period for new gTLDs began
> on 13 June 2012 and has been extended to 13 March 2013. Once the objection
> filing period closes, all objections received will move through a dispute
> resolution process."
>
> So I feel safe arguing we are now in a dispute resolution process
>
> I am not saying anything normative other than we should describe it in
> recognizable terms used by others in this case, as what the process its
> being called is not the crux of the issue at hand.  I have no opinion on
> whether this is an appropriate name for the objection-response-adjudication
> process.  But if necessary to get consensus on this, call it the objection
> and dispute resolution process.
>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2