NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
avri doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:22:56 +0000
Reply-To:
"Mueller, Milton L" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
"Mueller, Milton L" <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Actually it looks as if the EC never formally approved the ballot, which is a clear violation of the charter.

I understand the tendency to "let the chair do all the work" but there is a reason we wrote the charter to require EC approval of ballots. 

We had some prior controversies and wanted multiple eyes looking at the ballot before it was sent out.



> -----Original Message-----

> 

> I object to the EC and the Chair changing practice without a specific discussion

> among the members to do so.  This was sprung on us and then declared a

> done deal by executive decision.  I wish to challenge that executive decision.

> Elections are among the most important things we do.

> 

> avri


ATOM RSS1 RSS2