Sure, go ahead and delete it.

I'm more interested in hearing a cogent counter argument to that point.  I
hope those opposing it submit a comment.


---------------------------------------
Brenden Kuerbis
Internet Governance Project
http://internetgovernance.org


On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Seems a good suggestion to me.
>
> will people sign on if it is changed?
>
> avri
>
> On 4 Mar 2013, at 23:09, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>
> > Hi people, I generally agree. I suggest we do not use derisive
> expressions like "We find these claims to be hysterical...".
> >
> > frt rgds
> >
> > --c.a.
> >
> > On 03/04/2013 06:22 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> >> Dear NCSG members:
> >>
> >> A group of us, including so far Robin Gross, Avri Doria, Andrew Adams,
> Nicolas Adam and Brenden Kuerbis, have developed a comment with ICANN on
> the closed generic issue.
> >> You can read our comments at this Google docs link:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tPuEELJ2y6-d0hwF_qPupQb0V5OEFpqkMwcApDRNZf0/edit?usp=sharing
> >> We can still add names to the list of supporters, or you could file a
> quick and easy individual comment with ICANN expressing your support for
> the statement after it comes out.
> >>
> >> Milton L. Mueller
> >> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
> >> Internet Governance Project
> >> http://blog.internetgovernance.org
> >>
> >
>
>