Hi Avri,
Thank you very much. It seems that the most substantial proposals, in any
direction, are in document B (no consensus). Could you clarify what the
next steps of the WGEC are?
Thanks!
Marilia


On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
> Sorry about the forward as opposed to putting them on line somewhere.
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:        Documents pertaining to the third meeting of the WGEC as
> of at
> the time when the meeting concluded.
> Date:   Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:10:09 +0100
> From:   WGEC <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To:       Correspondence Group of the WGEC <[log in to unmask]>
> To:     [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> Dear WGEC and CG Members,
>
> Please find attached the documents pertaining to the third meeting of
> the WGEC as of at the time when the meeting concluded.
>
> Doc 1: Contains the recommendations that were agreed and those that will
> be revisited in the fourth meeting of the WGEC.
>
> Doc 2: Contains the recommendations which did not enjoy consensus in the
> meeting.
>
> Doc 3: Contains the recommendations under categories D and E that were
> not discussed in the meeting.
>
>
> Best regards
>
> CSTD Secretariat
>
>
>
>


-- 
*Marília Maciel*
Pesquisadora Gestora
Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio

Researcher and Coordinator
Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School
http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts

DiploFoundation associate
www.diplomacy.edu