Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Carlos Raúl G. |
Date: | Thu, 26 Jun 2014 08:19:49 +0100 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Shouldn't we do a more or less formal ballot?
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8335 2487
Enviado desde mi iPhone
> El 26/06/2014, a las 08:13, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> escribió:
>
> Hi
>
>> On Jun 25, 2014, at 11:55 PM, Sonigitu Ekpe <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Sam has withdrawn,
>
> Which is a pity
>
>> yet to hear from Milton.
>
> I’m going to guess he’s interested
>>
>> I nominate William Drake as one with vibrancy to stand the criteria.
>
> Thanks for the thought but there is no way I can take on another labor intensive volunteer job at this time.
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Lori Schulman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> As to Avri’s point, I agree that this is about NCSG and not constituencies
>>>
> 100% agreement---as with the Council, we need to avoid viewing SG representation as an inter-constituency squabble over positional goods. At this level things should be shared, including the workload.
>>> but it also should be about fairness and I didn’t even see the email that said we were running a ballot today.
>>>
> People were simply expressing support, it’s not a ballot.
>
> Best,
>
> Bill
>
>
|
|
|