+ 1

On 4/20/2016 5:42 PM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
> I agree, NCUC/NCSG are appropriate vehicles for publicizing these initiatives among civil society organizations/individuals, and many of its members may be interested in joining in, but #Internet4All does not seem to be a domain name policy issue and I think we had better stick to our basic mission.
>
> --MM
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
>> James Gannon
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 12:26 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign
>>
>> Just on this point I hope that as this seems to be an infrastructure related
>> campaign.
>>
>> Still reading about it at the moment but my gut reaction is that this may be
>> more appropriate for individual NCUC members and organisations to
>> endorse?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 20/04/2016, 17:12, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G."
>> <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Is ICANN (regional) staff participating in this activity? Could also be
>>> part of the information we may need for a qualified opinion.
>>>

-- 

Matthew Shears | Director, Global Internet Policy & Human Rights Project
Center for Democracy & Technology | cdt.org
E: [log in to unmask] | T: +44.771.247.2987