I agree that more due diligence is needed.

Best,

David S. Olson
Assistant Professor
BOSTON COLLEGE LAW SCHOOL
885 Centre St., Newton, MA 02459
tel: 617- 552-1378
fax: 617-552-4098
[log in to unmask]




On Sep 29, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:

> FYI, be careful if you visit the rds.hn site since it seems it has  
> been hacked
> at some time, and it has trojans and other stuff:
> http://safeweb.norton.com/report/show?url=rds.hn
>
> About the statement Milton is right to point out that that  
> particular statement
> came from LACTLD and not RDS.
>
> Getting involved with ccTLDs is a tricky situation and before we  
> make any
> "official" statement we should find out more directly from the RDS  
> people
> and also hear the other side of the story.
>
> No doubt any move to takeover the ccTLD administration in the way  
> it has
> been reported is not a desirable/preferred way of doing things, but  
> we don't
> know if this is an ongoing conflict since the HN Telecom Act of  
> 2002 and
> the reasons why RDS didn't enter into a formal agreement with CONATEL.
>
> I'll recommend we do some due diligence before making any statement  
> from
> the NCUC.
>
> Regards
> Jorge
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>  
> wrote:
>> Since many GAC members believe that governments should have a  
>> right to assert control over the ccTLD at will, I am not sure they  
>> are the best ones to take up this cause.
>>
>> However, I think this is a very important development and would  
>> favor having NCUC sign on to the LACTLD statement, or develop one  
>> of our own.
>>
>> --MM