NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vidushi Marda <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 6 Sep 2016 07:07:09 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (8 kB)
Dear All, 

I think the idea of deadlines for comments work well. Thanks for the suggestion Farzi. 

Can we make the last day for comments/feedback on the doc this Friday the 9th? That way we should be able to send in the doc by next week after incorporating them. 

Best, 

Vidushi 

----- On Sep 5, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Michael Oghia <[log in to unmask]> wrote: 

> +1 Farzi

> -Michael

> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 5:18 PM, farzaneh badii < [log in to unmask] >
> wrote:

>> Thank you Vidushi and Niels,
>> I think your document will benefit from more referencing to the actual policies
>> you are talking about. Also as Tatiana pointed out you need to resolve the
>> comments first. I suggest set a deadline for people to comment, then resolve
>> those comments and then send it out to policy committee. This is what we did in
>> the past and worked out well.

>> Best

>> Farzaneh

>> On 4 September 2016 at 14:33, Tatiana Tropina < [log in to unmask] >
>> wrote:

>>> Hi Niels and all,
>>> some of the comments in the google doc (e.g. Avri's comments) require further
>>> work and/or clarification, don't think the document can be sent to the PC as it
>>> is.
>>> Thanks!
>>> Tatiana

>>> On 4 September 2016 at 14:30, Niels ten Oever < [log in to unmask] >
>>> wrote:

>>>> Dear all,

>>>> This document has now been reviewed and commented on by several people,
>>>> perhaps the policy committee can pick this up?

>>>> Best,

>>>> Niels

>>>> On 08/30/2016 07:43 PM, Vidushi Marda wrote:
>>>> > Dear All,

>>>>> Please find the first draft comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedure WG at this
>>>>> link:
>>>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing

>>>>> While the request was extremely detailed with six subjects and specific
>>>>> questions under each, due to paucity of time, this draft only discusses over
>>>> > arching human rights concerns.

>>>> > I look forward to your feedback and comments.

>>>> > Best,

>>>> > Vidushi

>>>> > ----- On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Kathy Kleiman [log in to unmask] wrote:

>>>> >> Hi Niels,

>>>> >> I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did
>>>> >> not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working
>>>> >> Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind
>>>> >> enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG
>>>> >> participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment --
>>>> >> even a little late!

>>>> >> But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer
>>>> >> vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week for
>>>> >> comment would enable more people to participate.

>>>> >> Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR,

>>>> >> Kathy


>>>> >> On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>>>> >>> Dear all,

>>>> >>> I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive
>>>> >>> call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the
>>>> >>> gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community priority
>>>> >>> procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from
>>>> >>> the global south, etc).

>>>> >>> I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is
>>>> >>> over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be
>>>> >>> considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet.

>>>> >>> Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the
>>>> >>> report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR document [0].

>>>> >>> So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on
>>>> >>> Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to
>>>> >>> submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so
>>>> >>> you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :)

>>>> >>> All the best,

>>>> >>> Niels

>>>> >>> [0]
>>>> >>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/4.CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1467180138000&api=v2






>>>> --
>>>> Niels ten Oever
>>>> Head of Digital

>>>> Article 19
>>>> www.article19.org

>>>> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>>>> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9

>> --
>> Farzaneh


ATOM RSS1 RSS2