Hello Tomslin.
 There are no issues of concern for us as a stakeholder group. There's no
need for further comments from our end.

 Kind regards,

 Emmanuel


Sent from Mobile device. Excuse brevity and typos.


On Wed 13 Mar 2024 at 03:50, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> Thanks for the reminder. We didn't get any interest in writing a comment
> on this in NCSG. My question to you as our rep to the WG is, is there
> anything in the final report that we should be concerned about and that
> necessitates a comment?
>
> Warmly,
> Tomslin
>
>
>
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 23:52, Emmanuel Vitus <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> This is a final reminder to submit comments
>> <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/phase-1-final-report-of-the-epdp-on-internationalized-domain-names-23-01-2024>
>> on the EPDP on Internationalized Domain Names Phase 1 Final Report
>> <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2023/correspondence/epdp-idns2-leadership-team-et-al-to-gnso-council-et-al-08nov23-en.pdf>.
>> The report, which addresses key issues such as top-level gTLD definition
>> and variant management, will close for comments tomorrow.
>>
>> The EPDP Team proposes sixty-nine (69) recommendations related to the New
>> gTLD Program, covering areas from application fees to contractual
>> requirements. This is the last step before the board decides.
>>
>> Best,
>> Emmanuel
>>
>