+1

Does it however make sense to use part of the explanation given by Alissa
Cooper to outline why it is problematic to reference thus far unwritten
documents? Perhaps after this sentence:

"These were not part of the accepted proposal, and by referencing
as-yet-unwritten documents and exempting them from challenges they create
unacceptable risks" [because/such as etc.]


Or is that unnecessary?


best,


On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Mueller, Milton L <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Niels and Tatiana have added comments about the HR Section of the bylaws.
> Here is what we plan to turn in by May 20:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aAph84PWFWvxbKKmGG-PHQh9yJztarUO6qF8J6Ebv6s/edit?usp=sharing
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > > Dear colleagues
> > >
> > > Here are some proposed comments on the draft bylaws.
> > > Most of them echo comments already made by the CCWG and the ICG, but I
> > > think it worthwhile for NCSG to weigh in.
> > >
> > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aAph84PWFWvxbKKmGG-
> > PHQh9yJztarUO6q
> > > F8J6Ebv6s/edit?usp=sharing
> > >
> > > Dr. Milton L. Mueller
> > > Professor, School of Public Policy
> > > Georgia Institute of Technology
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
Corinne J.N. Cath