NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Benjamin Akinmoyeje <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Benjamin Akinmoyeje <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 23 Apr 2016 18:39:57 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1319 bytes) , text/html (1945 bytes)
Thank you Avri,

I will stay away from differentiating instead view them as interrelated the
issues, as one depends on the other.

I agree with your views about lending our support , but I disagree with the
fact that NCSG do not have the capacity even if it were to constrained to
the mission. Especially as these issues evolve everyday.

Thank you,
Benjamin




On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 5:53 PM, avri doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> On 23-Apr-16 12:10, Benjamin Akinmoyeje wrote:
> > So it will be fair to look at some of the purposes of these campaigns
> > and decide if you will support it or be against it because in the long
> > run they may affect the DNS issues that affect the NCUC members in
> > those regions or countries.
>
>
> Are you differentiating between support,
>
> - as in lending our name (NCSG) as an organization that thinks this is a
> good idea,support,
> - as in doing actual work.
>
> If so, the first type costs us nothing but lends our weigh to a related
> activity that we see positive value in.
>
> The second is the one that seem impossible from a capacity and priority
> perspective, And is possibly out of mission, if indeed we constrain our
> mission that way, which I think is another open issue.
>
> avri
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2