That's a shame! I would rather not fill in this survey!

-----------------
Arsène Tungali,
@arsenebaguma
+243 993810967
GPG: 523644A0
Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo

Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos)

> On Apr 20, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> I agree with your sentiments, Joan, as to the purpose of this exercise, but I would just like to add that is not possible to anonymise this data set. In addition to the fields we can see, I suspect the survey platform is collecting IP addresses, the date and time of submission, details on the browser, and other fingerprints which could be used to re-identify the respondent. This is particularly true given the volume of text boxes (versus multiple choice options) present, which allows for one's sentence structure / style to be analysed, and the likely small number of respondents. I think it is misleading for the consultants behind this survey to claim that they will anonymise the responses. They do not have the ability to do so. 
> 
> Ayden 
> 
> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: CCWG Accountability Work Stream2: please complete the Ombudsman Survey
>> Local Time: 20 April 2017 2:56 PM
>> UTC Time: 20 April 2017 13:56
>> From: [log in to unmask]
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> 
>> Thanks Farzi. 
>> 
>> It's important that surveys remain anonymous and the focus is on the response and critical input not the collection of personal data.
>> Cheers,
>> Joan 
>> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:24 AM, farzaneh badii <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> I will relay this to the WS2 ombuds group.
>>> 
>>> Best 
>>> 
>>> Farzaneh 
>>> 
>>> Farzaneh
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Joan Kerr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> Hi Dorothy,
>>>> I was so surprise that the personal questions were there too.  Even at the completion, they asked for your information if you want the review.
>>>> Joan
>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:29 PM, dorothy g <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>> Interesting,  I clicked open the survey and it asks for personal information which it says will not be given to ICANN. Why do I need to give my personal information to this third party?
>>>>> 
>>>>> best
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Maryam Bakoshi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> As part of the CCWG Accountability Work Stream 2 assignments, the ICANN Office of the Ombudsman is currently being assessed by an independent assessor. It would be great if you could spare 5-10min maximum to take part in the survey that closes at the end of this week.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Survey link: http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/3462816/ICANN
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Nathalie
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Nathalie Peregrine
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Specialist, SOAC Support (GNSO)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Email: [log in to unmask] 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
>>>>>> 
>