NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:54:50 +0300
Reply-To:
McTim <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: KASWESHA APPLICATION
From:
McTim <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
On 11/17/11, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> How to reconcile these two statements is a conundrum….

Indeed.

On the specifics of this application, while I am sure that KASWESHA is
a non-commercial organisation, the fact that they have a .co.ke might
be disqualifying.  I think this is unfair.

The domain kbo.co.ke is a multistakeholder PPP with the GoKenya,
Google, KENIC and others coming together to make it easy to get "kenya
Buisnesses Online", hence kbo.co.ke.

It's a free service, so fairly popular.

How does the NCSG-EC reconcile inclusion with rigid rules?

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2