+1


On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Joana Varon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Interesting. During NetMundial, president Dilma made a similar point in
> her opening speech: multilateral+multistakeholder.
>
> My take is that we would only solve this dilema trying to put things in
> practice, as I feal that so far we dont have a proper mutistakeholder
> process put in place with transparency and accountability.
>
> Best
>
> Joana
>
> -----
> Joana Varon Ferraz
> @joana_varon
> Researcher
> Center for Technology and Society
> Fundação Getulio Vargas
>
>
> On Sunday, June 22, 2014, Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> This is an example of the wording that the US Government is now using
>> when talking about the future of Internet governance. It helps when
>> thinking about the properties of a deliverable IANA transition proposal.
>> Internet Governance: Multistakeholder, Multilateral Sectors Can Coexist
>> *Internet Governance: Multistakeholder Consensus With Multilateral
>> Affirmation**by Daniel Sepulveda**
>>
>> "One of the issues at the center of discussions over the future of
>> Internet governance is how multilateral and multistakeholder institutions
>> with an interest in working on Internet-related issues can coexist without
>> duplication or conflict and without threatening to undermine the Internet
>> and its promise. In an ideal world, each would learn from the other, and
>> the activity of one would only add value to the other".
>>
>> Read more:
>> http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/article/2014/06/20140618301689.html#ixzz35O9PZiGR
>>
>> **Sepulveda serves as the U.S. deputy assistant secretary of state and
>> coordinator for international communications and information policy in the
>> Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs.*
>>
>> Sam Lanfranco
>>
>
>
> --
> Sent from Mobile
>



-- 
http://www.deepdishwavesofchange.org