NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:40:28 EDT
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (653 bytes) , text/html (982 bytes)
Carlos -- that's a good idea.  I might recommend that the statement by our 3 
Council reps be drafted with me and Milton (as our Task Force 
representatives).  That way, a careful statement of our understanding at both the TF and 
Council levels is reflected.  

Regards, Kathy

> 
> 
> This seems endless, but we should prepare carefully the statement of why 
> we voted in favor of the current formulation. It would be a single 
> statement for our three council reps, right?
> 
> I would insist with Bruce that each statement be immediately circulated 
> to all GNSO council members as soon as it is received -- which justifies 
> us doing ours as soon as possible.
> 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2