Should not would.  My idea not the plan
--
Paul
Sent from myMail app for Android Tuesday, 11 August 2015, 07:10AM -06:00 from David Post < [log in to unmask]> :

>At 10:37 PM 8/10/2015, Paul Rosenzweig wrote:
>>I would like to suggest that the single most 
>>critical aspect that the NCSG could comment on 
>>(and on which I plan to comment independently) 
>>is the one that has already been raised on this 
>>list by Milton – that is the ambiguity as to the 
>>role of governments in the reformed ICANN.  My own view is as follows:
>>
>>1)      If they wish, governments could 
>>participate as all other stakeholders do in the 
>>new community structure.  If they did that, 
>>however, they would lose the privileged status 
>>that their advice gets in board consideration. [SNIP]
>
>
>Paul: can you explain that?  Why would 
>participating in the new community structure mean 
>that GAC would lose its privileged status?
>
>David
>
>*******************************
>David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America Foundation
>blog (Volokh Conspiracy)  http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post
>book (Jefferson's Moose)  http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n
>music  http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic
>publications etc.  http://www.davidpost.com
>******************************* 
>