+1 Farzi
-Michael
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 5:18 PM, farzaneh badii <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Thank you Vidushi and Niels,
>
> I think your document will benefit from more referencing to the actual
> policies you are talking about. Also as Tatiana pointed out you need to
> resolve the comments first. I suggest set a deadline for people to comment,
> then resolve those comments and then send it out to policy committee. This
> is what we did in the past and worked out well.
>
> Best
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On 4 September 2016 at 14:33, Tatiana Tropina <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Niels and all,
>> some of the comments in the google doc (e.g. Avri's comments) require
>> further work and/or clarification, don't think the document can be sent to
>> the PC as it is.
>> Thanks!
>> Tatiana
>>
>> On 4 September 2016 at 14:30, Niels ten Oever <
>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> This document has now been reviewed and commented on by several people,
>>> perhaps the policy committee can pick this up?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Niels
>>>
>>> On 08/30/2016 07:43 PM, Vidushi Marda wrote:
>>> > Dear All,
>>> >
>>> > Please find the first draft comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedure
>>> WG at this link: https://docs.google.com/docume
>>> nt/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing
>>> >
>>> > While the request was extremely detailed with six subjects and
>>> specific questions under each, due to paucity of time, this draft only
>>> discusses over arching human rights concerns.
>>> >
>>> > I look forward to your feedback and comments.
>>> >
>>> > Best,
>>> >
>>> > Vidushi
>>> >
>>> > ----- On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Kathy Kleiman
>>> [log in to unmask] wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi Niels,
>>> >>
>>> >> I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did
>>> >> not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working
>>> >> Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind
>>> >> enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG
>>> >> participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment --
>>> >> even a little late!
>>> >>
>>> >> But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer
>>> >> vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week
>>> for
>>> >> comment would enable more people to participate.
>>> >>
>>> >> Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR,
>>> >>
>>> >> Kathy
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>>> >>> Dear all,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive
>>> >>> call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the
>>> >>> gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community
>>> priority
>>> >>> procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from
>>> >>> the global south, etc).
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is
>>> >>> over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be
>>> >>> considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the
>>> >>> report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR
>>> document [0].
>>> >>>
>>> >>> So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on
>>> >>> Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to
>>> >>> submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so
>>> >>> you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> All the best,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Niels
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [0]
>>> >>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/4.
>>> CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=146718
>>> 0138000&api=v2
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Niels ten Oever
>>> Head of Digital
>>>
>>> Article 19
>>> www.article19.org
>>>
>>> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>>> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Farzaneh
>
|
