NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Edward Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Edward Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:24:54 -0300
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1069 bytes) , text/html (1887 bytes)
Hi James,

Thanks for your hard work on this. Much appreciated.

Although I agree with your general sentiments, I really don't want the ALAC review to be delayed. I'm fine with holding off on the other reviews but ALAC is such a big part of whatever post transition regime we settle on I think it's best to help them make whatever reforms that are deemed necessary sooner rather than later.

In terms of community overload I might also suggest that increased commitment in terms of support (staff, travel) might help a bit.

Thanks again for your hard work, always difficult in the middle of the Meeting, that produced this document.

Best,

Ed 



Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 24, 2015, at 10:53 AM, James Gannon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Please find my initial drafting for the public comment to the AOC and Organisational review schedule that is coming to  close in the next few days.
> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLCWNYombphjN5Pxob4IVEXNMjyuNim8YPUNCQVdx3g/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> I welcome any comments or further input. 
> 
> -James


ATOM RSS1 RSS2